Traditional Valuation Models versus AI-Based Valuation Techniques: The Future of Investment Banking

Main Article Content

Siddh Ketan Morakhia

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is reshaping the financial industry at a pace that few technologies have matched. For decades, investment banks have relied on a well-established toolkit of Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis, Comparable Company Analysis (CCA), Precedent Transaction Analysis (PTA), and Leveraged Buyout (LBO) modelling to estimate the value of companies. These methods remain in daily use, yet their fit within an increasingly data-driven and AI-enabled financial system has become an open question. Rising market volatility, the proliferation of alternative data sources, and the rapid maturation of machine-learning algorithms all raise a common concern: whether valuation frameworks designed for an earlier information environment will remain effective in the years ahead. This study sets the traditional valuation models that dominate investment banking against the AI-based techniques now gaining ground across the industry. AI-based approaches draw on a range of technologies machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing (NLP), predictive analytics, and, most recently, generative AI to produce valuations that can be more accurate, faster to generate, and capable of absorbing far larger volumes of financial information than conventional methods allow. The research adopts a qualitative approach grounded in secondary data drawn from finance and adjacent fields, with each source assessed against criteria specific to the valuation model under discussion. The findings suggest that traditional and AI-based valuation each contribute something the other lacks. Traditional methods offer an established, theoretically grounded basis for estimating asset value and enjoy broad acceptance among regulators. AI-based methods, by contrast, integrate data from disparate sources and tend to improve the accuracy of value predictions. Taken together, the evidence indicates that AI-based systems are extending rather than displacing traditional valuation, enabling firms to manage and assess assets more effectively. The study concludes that investment banking is likely to move toward hybrid valuation frameworks that pair established financial theory with advanced AI. Such integration promises gains in valuation precision, operational efficiency, and strategic decision-making, while preserving the professional judgment and regulatory accountability on which the profession depends.

Article Details

How to Cite
Morakhia, S. K. (2026). Traditional Valuation Models versus AI-Based Valuation Techniques: The Future of Investment Banking. Journal of Daoist Studies, 19(S13), 161–171. Retrieved from https://journalofdaoiststudies.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2073
Section
Articles